"; if(is_file("header.php")) include "header.php"; else include "../header.php"; ?>

All his case rests on circumstantial evidence It is surprising that after so many years working "as an economic hit man" he doesn't have any concrete proofs for his claims. Where are the paper trails and MAIN's internal memos implicating members of the company and the government? Where are the audio tapes of his conspiratorial meetings? His training as an economic hit man is vaguely described. The name of the corrupt Saudi prince he pleased is not stated. Who was the mysterious "Doc"? After reading this book there are 3 possibilities: 1. He is saying the truth. 2. He thinks he is saying the truth (which reminds me of "A beautiful mind") 3. He made up the whole thing and he is now in the New York Times best selling list. I'm not taking sides here; I would not be surprised if what he claims is real. My point is that he does not construct a convincing argument to support his case, leaving you with one choice: take his word for it. Unfortunately I was told when I was a kid to never accept candy from strangers. The argument above just questions in wich shelf I should put the book at home, Fiction or Non-Fiction. Besides this, his story is fascinating.